This week, it was the Defense Teams’ turn to question Mr. Saloth Ban, Pol Pot’s nephew, who served as Secretary General of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) during the DK Regime. Saloth Ban was quite responsive to the Defense Counsels’ questions, all the while maintaining that Pol Pot was merely one of the “needles in the ocean,” which meant that Pol Pot did not make decisions on his own. Saloth Ban also explained about the concept “democratic centralism,” and gave insight into the Communist Party of Indochina and Angkar. He provided information on the roles of two senior Khmer Rouge officials, Chhim Sam Aok alias “Comrade Pang,” and a certain Cheam who worked at the MFA.
Upon the conclusion of Saloth Ban’s testimony, another insider witness and former aide of Koy Thuon, Mr. Pean Khean, was called to the stand. The OCP, led by Mr. Tarik Abdulhak and Mr. Vincent de Wilde d’Estmael, examined the Witness on the administrative and communication structures of his security unit and the roles of the three Accused. Pean Khean, a member of the ethnic minority known as “Kavet,” described his experience as a security guard, messenger and food procurer in the CPK. The Witness recounted what he knew of the roles and functions of K-1 and K-3. His proximity to the Khmer Rouge’s Minister of Commerce Koy Thuon alias “Thuch” and high-level cadre Pang allowed him to shed some light on the regime’s structure.
Read the report:
KRT Trial Monitor Issue No. 21 – Hearing on Evidence Week 16 (30 April, 2-3 May 2012) corresponds with Facing Justice Episode 18
English – Khmer
Posted in Case 002/01, Case 002/01 | Tags: 17th April 1975, 18th Episode, 2-3 May 2012, 7th January 1979, Abolition of Religion, Admissibility of summaries of documentary evidence, against, AIJI, Allegations of Judge’s Inappropriate Behavior, Andrew Ianuzzi, Angkar, Asian International Justice Initiative, Case 002/01, Central Committee, Chhim Sam Aok, Communist Party of Indochina, Communist Party of Kampuchea, Comrade Pang, cooperatives, CPK, CPK Office 100, democratic centralism, Democratic Kampuchea, DK, Dr. Dre, East West Center, ECCC, ECCC Internal Rules, Elizabeth Simmoneau-Fort, Enemies of Angkar, Episode 18, evacuation of Phnom Penh, Express Yourself, Extraordinary Chamber in the Court of Cambodia, Facing Justice, Genocide in Cambodia, Hearing of 30 April 2012, Hearing on Evidence Week 16, Hor Namhong, ICTY, Ieng Sary, in camera session, Jean-Marc Lavergne, Keat Chhon, Khieu Samphan, Khmer Mekong Film, Khmer Rouge Tribunal, King Sihanouk, KMF, Kong Sam Onn, Kounila Keo, Koy Thuon, KRT, KRT Trial Monitor, liberation of Phnom Penh, Mary Kristerie A. Baleva, messenger for Angkar, Michael Karnavas, Michiel Pestman, needles in the ocean, Nuon Chea, Office 870, Parties’ Documents Lists, Pean Khean, Penelope Van Tuyl, Pol Pot, Pol Pot’s nephew, Prime Minister Hun Sen, Princess B. Principe, Prosecutor v. Gotovina, Prosecutor v. Milotunovic, protection, right, Saloth Ban, Saut Toeung, secrecy during the DK, self-incrimination, Silva Cartwright, Sovanna Sek, Standing Committee, Steve Heder, Tarik Abdulhak, Trial Management, Veng Hout, Vidjia Phun, Vincent de Wilde d’Estmael, War Crimes Studies Center, WCSC, witness