This week, the Chamber and Parties proceeded to question the Accused on “The Implementation of CPK Policy at S-21” and the “Armed Conflict Between Vietnam and Cambodia” – two topic areas directly related to the charges Duch faces in the Closing Order. The Accused Person’s testimony on the former has been extensively explored with witnesses during previous weeks, and as such, did not appear to reveal any novel evidence. Consistent with his prior testimony, Duch further maintained that any active role he took to ensure the effective operation of S-21 was motivated by his fear of reprisal from the upper echelons of the command structure.
Read the report:
KRT Trial Monitor C001 Issue No. 8 – Hearing on Evidence (Week Ending 14 June 2009) corresponds with Duch on Trial Episode 7
English – Khmer
Posted in Case 001, Case 001 Reports | Tags: accused, admissibility of evidence, AIJI, Alain Werner, Berkeley, Case 001, Case File, Chamber, Children, Civil Parties, Civil Parties Allowed to Attend Trial Management Meeting, civil party, Closing Order, Co-Prosecutor, Command Structure, confessions, CPK, CPK Policy, Craig Etcheson, crime against humanity, DC Cam, Democratic Kampuchea, DK, Duch, East West Center, ECCC, Etcheson, Evidence, Francois Roux, Ho, Hong Kim Suon, Huy, ICTY, in camera, Independence Mastery, Indochina Federation, International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, irrelevant questions, Judge Cartwright, Kaing Guek Eav, killing, KMF, KRT, KRT Trial Monitor, Marie-Paule Carnizares, mens rea, Mom Nai, Nil Non, personal role, Pol Pot, Policy of Vietnamese Extermination, repetitive questions, Rule 87, S-21, S-21 Committee, Self-criticism, Seng Bunkheang, Silke Studzinsky, Smashing Prisoners, Son Sen, Special Court for Lebanon, Tan Senarong, torture, training, Translation Issues, Trial Management Meeting, Victim Participation, Vietnam, Vietnamese Communist Party, War Crimes, War Crimes Studies Center, William Smith, witness, witness list, witness protection and support