During this week’s proceedings, the Defense’s theory appeared to become clearer. As expert witnesses Mr. Nayan Chanda (on Monday and half of Tuesday) and Dr. Craig Etcheson (during the remainder of the week) were questioned, both the National and International Defense Counsel seemed to be determined to establish the notion that Duch was entirely subject to the will of his superiors, and had no choice but to follow the “party line”. Furthermore, both Defense counsels also attempted to insinuate that Duch was but a “scapegoat”, by espousing that more responsible people could have been brought to trial, or even testifying as witnesses.
Read the report:
KRT Trial Monitor C001 Issue No. 7 – Hearing on Evidence (Week Ending 31 May 2009) corresponds with Duch on Trial Episode 6
English – Khmer
Posted in Case 001, Case 001 Reports | Tags: 17th April 1975, accused, Admissibility of Confessions Given Under Torture, admissibility of evidence, AIJI, Alain Werner, Alex Bates, Anti-Imperialist, Anti-Vietnamese Policies, Article 15, Article 38, Berkeley, Black Book, Brother Enemy: The War After the War, Cambodian Constitution, Case 001, CAT, Chamber, civil party, Co-Prosecutor, Common Law, communication, CPK, Craig Etcheson, DC Cam, December 1977, defense, Democratic Kampuchea, Division 502, DK, Duch, East West Center, ECCC, enemies, Executions, Expert Witness, experts credibility, Far Eastern Economic Review, Francois Roux, Geneva Conference 1954, Hong Kim Suon, ICTR, ICTY, Ieng Sary, Indochina, Internal Rules, Judge Cartwright, Judge Lavergne, Kaing Guek Eav, Kar Savuth, Khmer Rouge, Killings, Kim Suon, KMF, KRT, KRT Trial Monitor, Lon Nol, mass graves, Ministry of Information, Nayan Chanda, Nil Nonn, Party Line, Phnom Penh, Pol Pot, Prince Sihanouk, Prosecutor v Muhimana, Pulau Wai island, purges, Rule 21, S-21, S-21 confessions, Security Office, Seng Bunkheang, Smash, Son Sen, Sou Met, Standing Committee, Tan Sen Narong, torture, Translation Issues, Trial, United Nations Convention Against Torture, United States Embassy, Victim and Witness Protection and Support, Victim Participation, Vietnam, Vietnamese-Cambodian border, Vietnamese-Cambodian Relationship, Vo Dong Giang, War Crimes Studies Center